Washington D.C.

State of Washington D.C.

Benefits of Electricity Market Competition

Competitive electricity markets are well-structured with effective oversight, and deliver economic and environmental benefits to consumers. These markets have been restructured to promote competition among energy market participants, while maintaining strict regulatory oversight. Competition in these markets fosters innovation, clean energy solutions, green jobs, and affordable energy.

In competitive markets, power suppliers compete against each other to provide the best possible service at the lowest cost in order to attract and retain customers. Comparatively, in monopoly-regulated states, incumbent power providers have no incentive to innovate or lower costs because ratepayers are captive to their monopoly-protected supplier.

Today, more than two-thirds of the nation’s electricity consumers live or do business in states that are part of organized competitive wholesale and retail electricity markets.

Recent Examples of Rate Increases in Vertically Integrated States

THE SOUTH
In March 2010, consumers in the Tennessee Valley Authority’s seven-state service territory started paying between $2.50 and $5.50 more a month due to fuel cost adjustments. This increase is in addition to the 20 percent rate hike ($12 to $15 increase per 1,000 kilowatt-hours per month) that went into effect in October 2008. The rate hike was factored into TVA's 2009 budget, which included $12.6 billion to cover operating expenses and nearly $2.1 billion for new capital investments.

ALABAMA
A typical customer of Alabama Power Company will pay almost $200 a year more, or about $16 per month, for electricity under a rate hike of 14.6 percent, starting October 9th pending approval by the state Public Utility Commission. Electricity costs would also rise about 16 percent for commercial users and an average of 25 percent for industrial customers, if the entire request is approved.

Overview of Economic and Environmental Benefits of RTO/ISO Markets

Our nation faces significant energy and environmental policy challenges. The organized markets operated by the Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs) and Independent System Operators (ISOs) are the best way to assure an efficient and adequate supply of electricity and to meet the nation’s current and future energy and environmental needs. RTOs and ISOs are delivering benefits today in the following areas:

America must take aggressive action to tackle our energy challenges, and the electric power industry is uniquely situated to lead the way. The COMPETE Coalition is dedicated to ensuring that policymakers at all levels recognize that well-structured organized electricity markets are essential. The RTOs and ISOs are providing the level playing field, renewable generation, demand resources, customer tools and efficient markets that are proving to be essential in achieving these goals and holding down costs to consumers along the way.

Overview of Regulation and Oversight in the Electricity Industry

Problems in the financial markets have been attributed in some measure to “deregulation” and ineffective regulation and oversight. But there is no corollary with the organized competitive electricity markets, which often are erroneously described as “deregulated.” While the electricity industry has undergone restructuring over the last decade, regulation and oversight are as strong now as they ever were before restructuring and vigorously protect against the same types of problems occurring in the electricity industry.

COMPETE Policy Blueprint

Electricity Policy Considerations for the Obama Administration and the 111th Congress

EPSA PowerFact: Organized Wholesale Markets Are Competitive and Delivering Benefits to Consumers

The independent market monitors for every Independent System Operator (ISO) and Regional Transmission Organization (RTO) in the country have once again found these organized markets are competitive and provide economic benefits to consumers, based on detailed reports for 2009. The annual reports note that the organized wholesale markets are appropriately reflecting lower fuel prices and passing these competitive power options along to consumers, with electricity prices dropping by roughly 50 percent from 2008 to 2009.
 

Statement on White House and Senate Clean Energy Summit

COMPETE Calls on Obama, Congress to Consider Market-Based Approach to Climate Change and Energy Goals

On June 29, President Obama convened a bipartisan group of Senators to discuss a framework for clean energy legislation. Following is a statement by the Honorable Federico Peña, former U.S. Secretary of Energy (1997-1998) and co-chairman of the COMPETE Coalition, on the role competitive markets should play to address the nation’s energy and environmental challenges.
 
“As President Obama convenes a bipartisan group of Congressional lawmakers to consider how to reduce greenhouse emissions and stimulate clean energy innovation, both consumers and the environment will prosper if they agree to embrace the power of a market-based approach.
 

Statement on the Senate’s Vote to Confirm the Nominations of Phillip Moeller and Cheryl LaFleur to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

On June 22, the U.S. Senate unanimously confirmed the nominations of Phllip Moeller and Cheryl LaFleur to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Following is a statement by the Hon. Bill Massey, former FERC Commissioner and counsel to the COMPETE Coalition.
 
“The COMPETE Coalition congratulates Cheryl LaFleur and Phil Moeller on their confirmation as FERC commissioners. FERC has tremendous responsibility as the consumer watchdog for America’s energy infrastructure and future, and both LaFleur and Moeller are exceptionally qualified to serve on the Commission. Their wealth of experience has given them a keen understanding of FERC’s long-standing policies supporting competition in the public interest."
 

Lawmakers Unveil Bills to Increase Consumer Choice in Michigan’s Electricity Market

Proposed legislation would provide economic and environmental benefits

Washington, DC – Legislators in Michigan have introduced legislation to ease limitations on the number of consumers in the state who can purchase power from competitive power suppliers. The companion bills introduced by Senator Wayne Kuipers and Representative Roy Schmidt would raise the state’s limit on retail choice from 10 percent to 25 percent of the utility’s total electricity demand.
 
“When power suppliers compete against one another, consumers win,” said Bill Massey, COMPETE Counsel and former Federal Energy Regulatory Commissioner. “These lawmakers are standing up for their constituents with legislation that will allow access to lower-cost electricity supplies. Allowing markets to work will promote private investment in clean energy generation and green jobs, allowing innovative solutions to meet electricity needs and environmental objectives.”